Integrasi Generative AI dalam Pengembangan Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran: Analisis Kualitas dan Tantangan bagi Calon Guru

  • Mirna Mirna Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Dian Mughnisani Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Nadila Kamaruddin Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Anita Candra Dewi Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i2.3597
Keywords: generative AI, alur tujuan pembelajaran, calon guru, kurikulum merdeka, literasi digital, etika pedagogis

Abstract

Perkembangan Generative AI memberikan peluang dalam perencanaan pembelajaran, khususnya dalam penyusunan Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran (ATP) pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pemanfaatan model berbasis large language model (LLM) dalam membantu mahasiswa calon guru merancang ATP. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur sistematis dengan pendekatan analisis komparatif terhadap lima dimensi, yaitu efektivitas penerjemahan Capaian Pembelajaran (CP), kualitas pedagogi, literasi digital mahasiswa, hambatan implementasi, serta implikasi etika. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Generative AI mampu menghasilkan ATP yang terstruktur dan logis, namun masih memiliki keterbatasan dalam konteks lokal, kedalaman pedagogi, dan kreativitas pembelajaran. Selain itu, ketergantungan berlebih pada AI berpotensi menurunkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kemandirian profesional mahasiswa. Oleh karena itu, penggunaan AI direkomendasikan sebagai alat bantu dalam desain pembelajaran (AI-assisted teaching design), bukan sebagai pengganti kompetensi pedagogis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT inpromoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62.https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of Generative
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. Proceedings of FAccT 2021, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Bernstein, M. S., Terry, M., Kane, S. K., & Chilton, L. B. (2023). Generative AI and creative work: Tensions, perspectives, and the question of authorship. ACM CHI Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581412
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press / McGraw-Hill.
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information ProcessingSystems, 33, 1877–1901. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165
Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 89–101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032881
Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Jasche, C., & Heinz, C. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126.
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Santos, O.C., & Koedinger, K. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Shi, E., Hoi, S. C. H., & Faltings, B. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kemendikbudristek (2022). Panduan Pengembangan Kurikulum Operasional SatuanPendidikan. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors inComputing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2022). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. UCL Knowledge Lab & Pearson.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Prahani, B. K., Deta, U. A., Wahyuni, S., Saphira, H. V., Mahtari, S., & Mubarok, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education research during 2010–2020 and itsimplications for sustainable education. Sustainability, 15(4), 3506. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043506
Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. Proceedings of IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620 631https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Wahyudi, Sartono, E. K. E., & Rokhani (2023). Implementasi alur tujuan pembelajaran berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka: Studi kasus sekolah penggerak. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8i2.3142
Published
2026-05-29
How to Cite
Mirna, M., Mughnisani, D., Kamaruddin, N., & Dewi, A. C. (2026). Integrasi Generative AI dalam Pengembangan Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran: Analisis Kualitas dan Tantangan bagi Calon Guru. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(2), 1872-1883. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i2.3597
Issue
Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Mirna Mirna, Dian Mughnisani, Nadila Kamaruddin, Anita Candra Dewi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.

License

The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

User/Public Rights

Under the Creative Commons license, users are allowed to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.

Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

  • Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. The journal will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. The journal will only communicate with the corresponding author.

Royalties

Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that the journal entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.

Miscellaneous

The article will be published in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. The editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.