Hypersemiotics of Batak Cultural Symbols in TikTok Content: Shifting Meanings and Digital Identity

  • Rahel Theresia Rodame Situmorang Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Jekmen Sinulingga Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Tifany Tifany Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Arjuna Junifer Siregar Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Dion Nardi Pangaribuan Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Keywords: hypersemiotics, cultural symbols, Batak, TikTok

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the shifting meanings of Batak cultural symbols in TikTok content through a hypersemiotic approach. The phenomenon of digitalization has driven a transformation in how society represents cultural identity, including in the use of traditional symbols such as ulos, traditional gestures, and Batak language expressions. The research method used was descriptive qualitative, with data collection techniques consisting of observations of TikTok content containing Batak cultural elements, as well as visual and textual documentation. Data analysis was conducted with reference to the concept of hypersemiotics, which emphasizes simulation, sign reproduction, and the shift in meaning from their original context to the digital context. The results show that Batak cultural symbols have undergone a shift in meaning, from being sacred and contextual to becoming more flexible, aesthetic, and sometimes even diminished. In the digital space, these symbols no longer fully represent traditional values, but instead function as tools for identity expression, entertainment, and cultural commodification. Furthermore, a tendency among the younger generation to construct digital identities through reinterpreting cultural symbols is found to be more adaptive to social media trends. Thus, hypersemiotics is a relevant approach to understanding the dynamics of meaning in the digital era. This research is expected to contribute to the study of cultural semiotics and serve as a reference for understanding the transformation of Batak cultural identity on social media.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno, T. W. (1991). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993295

Anggawirya, A. M., Sudipa, I. N., & Santika, I. D. A. D. M. (2023). Cultural representation in digital media: A TikTok perspective. Mukasi Journal, 5(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v5i2.4257

Azhaar, M., Rahman, A., & Putra, H. (2025). Analisis semiotika konten TikTok. Proceedings ICCL, 2(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.20961/iccl.v2i1.728

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. Fontana Press. https://monoskop.org/images/7/79/Barthes_Roland_Image_Music_Text.pdf

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vzv

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514

Cusnir, R. (2025). TikTok as a semiotic technology: Design and experience. ResearchGate Publication. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.39468.85522

Eco, U. (1986). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt16gz8hn

Fadillah, N., Juanda, & Nensilianti. (2024). Analisis semiotika dalam media sosial TikTok. Jurnal Dinamika, 6(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.25157/dinamika.v6i1.5889

Fadhillah, R., Pratiwi, A., & Sari, M. (2024). Simbol visual dalam komunikasi digital TikTok. Jurnal Elite, 7(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.26740/elite.v7n2.p88-102

Fadli, M., & Elviria, R. (2024). Representasi budaya dalam konten TikTok. Jurnal Communication Studies, 5(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.22437/jcoms.v5i1.36

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221902

Halim, A., & Sari, D. (2023). Meme sebagai representasi identitas generasi Z. Communica Journal, 4(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.59141/communica.v4i1.775

Hanafiah, R. (2025). Globalisasi budaya dalam media digital TikTok. Jurnal Semiotika, 9(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.30813/semiotika.v9i1.8327

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619720

Lestari, D., & Putri, A. (2024). Representasi kecantikan dalam media TikTok. Jurnal IcomMedig, 3(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.25299/icommedig.2024.26370

Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674497906

Saussure, F. de. (1916). Course in general linguistics. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789149.001.0001

Wilantari, N. (2024). TikTok sebagai media komunikasi budaya lokal. Dharma Duta, 8(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.33363/dd.v8i1.1501

Published
2026-06-16
How to Cite
Situmorang, R. T. R., Sinulingga, J., Tifany, T., Siregar, A. J., & Pangaribuan, D. N. (2026). Hypersemiotics of Batak Cultural Symbols in TikTok Content: Shifting Meanings and Digital Identity. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(2), 2461-2470. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i2.3411
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)