Perbandingan Pembelajaran Menyenangkan dalam PAIKEM dan Deep Learning

  • Kinanti Swastika Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Liliana Muliastuti Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Edi Puryanto Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: augmented reality, multiliteracy, reading comprehension, Indonesian language learning, quasi experiment

Abstract

21st-century education demands an approach that focuses not only on academic outcomes but also on the cognitive, affective, and emotional engagement of learners. "Joyful learning" has emerged as a key strategy implemented through various frameworks, such as PAIKEM and the Joyful Learning model, within the context of Deep Learning. This study aims to compare the implementation of joyful learning in PAIKEM and the Joyful Learning model and to analyze the potential for integrating them to foster deep learning. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method with a qualitative descriptive approach was employed, analyzing reputable articles (Q1–Q2) published between 2023 and 2025. Out of 52 identified articles, 14 met the inclusion criteria. The findings indicate that PAIKEM effectively enhances student engagement, creativity, and participation through activity-based learning, though it still requires a stronger emphasis on conceptual reflection. In contrast, the Joyful Learning model places greater emphasis on emotional and psychological aspects that support intrinsic motivation and deep understanding. Integrating these two approaches holds the potential to create a "Deep Joyful Learning Experience" that is active, enjoyable, and meaningful.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Y. (2016). Desain sistem pembelajaran dalam konteks Kurikulum 2013. Refika Aditama.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 1–13.

Hosnan. (2016). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Ghalia Indonesia.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report, Keele University.

Kumar, M. (2019). Joyful learning: A pathway to holistic education. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 8(2), 55–61.

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

Mulyasa. (2015). Menjadi guru profesional: Menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. RoutledgeFalmer.

Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Merrill.

Scott, G. (2010). Joyful learning in the classroom. ASCD.

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770.

Suyadi. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran pendidikan karakter. Remaja Rosdakarya

Published
2026-09-14
How to Cite
Swastika, K., Muliastuti, L., & Puryanto, E. (2026). Perbandingan Pembelajaran Menyenangkan dalam PAIKEM dan Deep Learning. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(3), 4177-4185. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i3.4343
Section
Articles