The Courtesy of Bugis: A Systematic Scoping Review of Forms, Social Meanings, And Cultural Values

  • Musliadi Musliadi Cokroaminoto Palopo University
  • Reski Yusrini Islamiah Yunus Cokroaminoto Palopo University
  • Hafirah Patang Cokroaminoto Palopo University
Keywords: Bugis politeness; cultural values; linguistic forms; Socio pragmatics

Abstract

Bugis politeness represents a culturally grounded system through which speakers negotiate respect, dignity, solidarity, and social relationships. However, scholarship remains dispersed across linguistic, pragmatic, educational, and cultural studies. This systematic scoping review synthesizes evidence concerning the linguistic forms, social meanings, contextual variation, and cultural values of Bugis politeness. Google Scholar was used as the sole database, and study selection and reporting followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Three bilingual search strings combined Bugis or Buginese with terms concerning politeness, honorifics, social deixis, address, speech acts, and cultural values. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, 19 studies were included and thematically analyzed. Bugis politeness was realized through deferential forms, including idi’, ta-, -ta’, -ki’, and -ni’; familiar forms, including iko, mu-, -mu, -ko, and -no; address and kinship terms; honorifics; particles such as iye’ and tabe’; indirectness; mitigation; and context-sensitive speech-act strategies. These resources expressed deference, familiarity, solidarity, and interpersonal distance, while their appropriateness depended on age, status, kinship, gender, familiarity, communicative purpose, and setting. The synthesis further showed that sipakatau, sipakalebbi’, sipakainge’, siri’, pesse, and pangngaderreng connected linguistic conduct with human recognition, respect, responsible correction, dignity, compassion, and customary order. Bugis politeness is therefore best understood as a moral-relational practice rather than a fixed inventory of courteous expressions. Although culturally marked forms remain significant, their use is being reinterpreted through generational change, Bugis–Indonesian contact, education, mobility, and changing hierarchies. Evidence concerning migration and digitally mediated interaction remains limited, requiring research across communities, generations, and communicative environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdollah, A., & Sulo, M. (2018). The meaning of sipakatau, sipakalebbi, and sipakainge in Wajo: A semantical analysis. Tamaddun, 17(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v17i2.16

Achmad, S. (2012). Strategi kesopanan berbahasa masyarakat Bugis Pinrang Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 40(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v40i12012p1-13

Agus, N. (2014). Bentuk sapaan bahasa Bugis dalam konteks pragmatik gender [The form of Buginese language greeting in gender pragmatic context]. Sawerigading, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v20i1.12

Alam, F. A., & Al-Muthmainnah. (2020). Exploring local wisdom in Buginese ethnics: Language politeness phenomena of Tau Soppeng. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 2(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v2i1.3767

Azis, A. D. (2020). Bugis language maintenance strategy in Lombok. SeBaSa, 3(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v3i2.2508

Blitvich, P. G.-C., & Sifianou, M. (2019). Im/politeness and discursive pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015

Cisternas Irarrázabal, C., & Olate Vinet, A. (2020). Linguistic ideologies about American Indigenous languages: A systematic review of research articles. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(3), 755–773. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n03a09

Daar, G. F., Beratha, N. L. S., Suastra, I. M., & Sukarini, N. W. (2023). The off-record politeness strategy and cultural values of the belis negotiation speech event: A sociopragmatic study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.48746

Daud, N. (2018). The politeness strategies of negation used by English and Buginese. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v1i1.4069

Dwi Putri, A., Bakri, I., & Fisma. (2025). Adaptive politeness and hierarchical negotiation: A sociopragmatic study of Bugis and Konjo speech communities in South Sulawesi. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(4), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i4.47879

Eslami, Z. R., Larina, T. V., & Pashmforoosh, R. (2023). Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 27(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34051

Gusnawaty, Lukman, & Nurwati, A. (2022a). A closer look on linguistic politeness among Bugis youth: Tabék in situational and philosophical context. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i2.9870

Gusnawaty, Lukman, Nurwati, A., Adha, A., Nurhawara, & Edy, A. (2022b). Strategy of kinship terms as a politeness model in maintaining social interaction: Local values towards global harmony. Heliyon, 8(9), Article e10650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10650

Harris, S., & Sartini, N. W. (2025). Strategi kesopanan dalam persuasi oleh juri The Voice Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat: Studi pragmatik lintas budaya. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(3), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v8i3.1369

Hasrianti, A. (2014). Kesantunan dan hubungan sosial dalam masyarakat Bugis di Sulsel [Politeness and social relations in Bugis society in South Sulawesi]. Pusaka: Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan, 2(1), 31–51. https://journal.blamakassar.com/pusaka/article/view/119

Hilte, L., Daelemans, W., & Vandekerckhove, R. (2021). Interlocutors’ age impacts teenagers’ online writing style: Accommodation in intra- and intergenerational online conversations. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 738278. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.738278

Inayah, F. Z. (2025). Politeness strategies in netizens’ comments on public figures: A case study on Fuji An’s TikTok. Essence: Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33367/essence.v2i1.7851

Irwanto, I., & Muhlis, M. (2025). Pola kesantunan berbahasa Bugis dalam tindak tutur memerintah di Samarinda Seberang Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Basataka, 8(1), 758–772. https://doi.org/10.36277/basataka.v8i1.947

Kecskes, I. (2017). Context-dependency and impoliteness in intercultural communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 13(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0019

Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Mahmud, M. (2010). Grammatical expression of Bugis politeness. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v5i1.618

Mahmud, M. (2011). Politeness practices in Bugis society. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 23(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v23i1.4318

Mahmud, M. (2013). The roles of social status, age, gender, familiarity, and situation in being polite for Bugis society. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p58

Nashruddin, Alam, F. A., & Harun, A. (2020). Moral values found in linguistic politeness patterns of Bugis society. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v4i1.340

Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167

Prayitno, H. J., Huda, M., Inayah, N., Ermanto, Ardi, H., Giyoto, & Yusof, N. (2021). Politeness of directive speech acts on social media discourse and its implications for strengthening student character education in the era of global education. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16205

Room, R. (2025). Kesantunan berbahasa terhadap nilai budaya suku Bugis-Makassar: Suatu telaah sosiopragmatik. ISOLEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 3(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.59638/isolek.v3i2.790

Room, R., & Syukriady, D. (2024). Sapaan santun “iye” dan “tabe” dalam falsafah budaya suku Bugis-Makassar. ISOLEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 2(2), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.59638/isolek.v2i2.412

Saeful, M. (2021). Strategi kesantunan bahasa Bugis dalam tindak tutur memerintah di Kecamatan Ujung Loe Kabupaten Bulukumba. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i2.73

Sukarno. (2010). The reflection of the Javanese cultural concepts in the politeness of Javanese. K@ta, 12(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.12.1.59-71

Sukmawaty, Andini, C., & Rahman, F. F. (2022). The shift of honorifics due to the promotion as a government official: Comparative study. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.20817

Sunnuraini, & Yassi, A. H. (2022). The analysis of politeness strategies in Buginese Bone language. EDUVELOP: Journal of English Education and Development, 5(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v5i2.1395

Tahir, M. D., Yusuf, Y. M., Tenrisanna, R., & Sunnuraini. (2026). Politeness in Bugis family discourse: An ethnolinguistic study on the influence of education. Dialectica Online Publishing Journal, 1(2). https://dop-journals.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/18

Taufiq, A. M., Amar, M. A., & Sukarni. (2026). Strategi kesantunan dan realisasi tindak tutur dalam interaksi sosial masyarakat Bugis: Kajian sosiopragmatik. Panthera: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan, 6(1), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.36312/panthera.v6i1.959

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Published
2026-08-08
How to Cite
Musliadi, M., Reski Yusrini Islamiah Yunus, & Hafirah Patang. (2026). The Courtesy of Bugis: A Systematic Scoping Review of Forms, Social Meanings, And Cultural Values. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(3), 3669-3685. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i3.2993
Section
Articles