ChatGPT as a Cognitive Tool in Sociology: Students’ Perceptions and Its Impact on Academic Writing Practices
Abstract
This study examines how undergraduate sociology students perceive and use ChatGPT as a cognitive tool in their academic writing, focusing on its influence on reasoning, writing strategies, and ethical judgment. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected from 18 sociology students through in-depth semi-structured interviews and comparative analysis of writing samples produced with and without ChatGPT. Thematic analysis generated three key findings. First, students described ChatGPT as cognitive scaffolding that helped them clarify abstract sociological concepts, generate ideas, and articulate theoretical explanations more coherently. Many viewed the tool as a “thinking companion” that reduced conceptual barriers when engaging with complex theories. Second, ChatGPT contributed to shifts in writing strategies, with students moving from unstructured drafting to more systematic practices such as outlining, coherence checking, and iterative refinement. These changes were evident in writing samples, which demonstrated clearer argumentation and improved organization after AI-assisted drafting. Third, students negotiated a tension between assistance and dependence. While recognizing the tool’s benefits, they expressed concerns about losing their academic voice, weakening critical thinking, or relying too heavily on AI-generated structures. Consequently, they adopted selective strategies, including verifying theoretical content and revising AI-generated text. ChatGPT emerged as a supplementary cognitive partner rather than a replacement for sociological reasoning. The findings underscore the need to integrate AI literacy into sociology curricula to promote critical and ethical AI use in academic writing.
Downloads
References
Arsyad, S. N., Putri, F. M., & Malik, A. R. (2024). Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes in Social Studies: An Investigation Into The Lazarus Educational Game. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 12(1), 1-9.
Becker, L., & Park, S. (2022). Cognitive processes in academic writing among undergraduate social science students. Studies in Writing Research, 18(1), 22–39.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623.
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. (2023). ChatGPT and academic integrity: Student perspectives and ethical dilemmas. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15.
Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). Generative AI for education: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Huang, L., & Santos, R. (2023). Effects of AI-based text generators on student academic writing. Journal of Writing Analytics, 7(1), 55–78.
Jang, H., & Lee, J. (2024). The impact of large language models on students’ drafting and revision practices. Computers & Education, 207, 104815.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Cognitive opportunities and risks. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 1443–1465.
Kumar, R., & Patel, M. (2024). Distributed cognition in AI-assisted learning: Rethinking student-AI interaction. Learning and Instruction, 88, 101783.
Lim, J., Park, Y., & Choi, D. (2024). Metacognitive engagement through AI writing assistants: A study of university writers. Journal of Learning Sciences, 33(1), 78–102.
Liu, Y., & Zheng, H. (2023). Cognitive load reduction using ChatGPT in academic tasks: Evidence from undergraduate learners. Journal of Applied Learning Technologies, 5(2), 90–104.
Malik, A. R. (2025). Smart Classrooms as Linguistic Ecosystems: A New Paradigm for Interactive Language Pedagogy. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 5(2), 1759–1773. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.348
Malik, A. R. (2025). Ethical Issues in Using Jasper AI and Scribbr for Academic Writing among University Students. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 5(1), 440–447. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i1.1347
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis, A. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: higher education student's perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296.
Mills, A. (2021). Sociological writing and cognitive development in undergraduate education. Routledge.
Müller, K. (2024). AI and the humanities: Rethinking writing practices in an age of automation. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 23(2), 189–210.
Nugroho, S., & Sari, D. (2024). Barriers to academic reading and writing among Indonesian university students. Indonesian Journal of Language and Education Studies, 12(1), 33–47.
Perkins, R., & Lowenthal, P. (2023). AI literacy as a core component of 21st-century higher education. TechTrends, 67(5), 874–885.
Putri, F., & Hamzah, A. (2023). Reflective learning with AI writing assistants: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Reflection, 8(3), 112–129.
Rahman, A., & Idris, M. (2023). Academic writing difficulties among social science undergraduates in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 9(1), 45–60.
Sanderson, K., & Lee, P. (2024). Writing anxiety and linguistic barriers in undergraduate sociology students. Journal of Social Research Methods, 16(2), 201–220.
Sutton, M. (2023). Risks of overreliance on generative AI in student writing. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 45–61.
Tan, Y., & Wibowo, A. (2022). Argument coherence and disciplinary writing challenges in the social sciences. Journal of Academic Writing, 12(1), 66–84.
Wen, X., & Zhao, L. (2024). Originality concerns in AI-assisted academic writing. Computers and Composition, 71, 102977.
Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2023). Algorithmic governance and ethical challenges in AI-driven education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 21(1), 1–15.
Zawacki-Richter, O. (2023). Ethical considerations in the integration of AI in higher education. Educational Research Review, 38, 100506.
Copyright (c) 2025 Agung Rinaldy Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
License
The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User/Public Rights
Under the Creative Commons license, users are allowed to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. The journal will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. The journal will only communicate with the corresponding author.
Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that the journal entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
Miscellaneous
The article will be published in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. The editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
