Examining Syntactic Complexity in EFL Learners’ IELTS Writing Performance

  • Komara Suhendar Universitas LIA, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: syntactic complexity, EFL Learners, IELT writing performance

Abstract

This study investigated IELTS writing performance among EFL learners with advanced proficiency in terms of syntactic complexity. Following Lu’s proposal (2011) on the indices of syntactic complexity, the writings were analysed through several measures, such as length of production, sentence complexity, subordination, coordination, and particular structures (e.g. complex nominals and verb phrases). The findings of this study reveal that. The findings reveal that learners construct sentences primarily through clausal structures, with a mean sentence length of 16.55 words and an average of 2.26 clauses per sentence. At the same time, they also demonstrate dominance in the use of complex nominals and coordinate phrases, which accounted for 4.49 per T-unit and 5.85 per T-unit, respectively. While these findings partially support the view that growth in one domain can lead to a reduction in another, they also present a more nuanced perspective. Specifically, the results suggest that advanced learners tend to employ clausal complexity to achieve cohesion and phrasal complexity to ensure conciseness in their writing. These findings extend the existing literature on syntactic complexity by emphasizing the interplay between clausal and phrasal constructions in advanced learners’ writing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Does writing development equal writing quality? Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048
Ishikawa, T. (1995). Objective measures of writing fluency: Temporal variables and syntactic complexity. The Language Teacher, 19(7), 17–21.
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12468
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
Ortega, L. (2015). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and directions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008
Polat, B., & Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt006
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Uzun, K. (2021). Exploring the interplay of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in EFL writing: Testing the trade-off and threshold hypotheses. System, 98, 102460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102460
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. University of Hawai’i Press.
Published
2025-10-30
How to Cite
Suhendar, K. (2025). Examining Syntactic Complexity in EFL Learners’ IELTS Writing Performance. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(4), 4425-4433. Retrieved from https://www.dmi-journals.org/deiktis/article/view/2304
Section
Articles